【劉悅笛】在思惟與學術之間一包養行情：能否多做點“多點思惟”的學術

Liu Lie (researcher at the Institute of Philosophy of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences):I am very grateful. I want to talk about this topic, and to develop the topic I originally wanted to talk about – “The Philosophy of Love toward the Chinese People”…, that is, toward a “emotion-based” Chinese philosophy, but I want to stick to tomorrow’s theme – thinking and learning for forty years!

My topic is “Between thinking and learning: Can you do more “more thinking” in the science of “more thinking”! 》This appeal is very important, and today’s academic studies need to think more! But this problem is not contrary to the idea of ​​”more academic” thinking, because thinking must be based on certain academics. Because thinking is not groundless in theory or practice, or perhaps from theory or from reality, Sun Zhongshan said that “it is difficult to know and easy to do”. It is difficult to do but know it. This inclusive market is different from the difficulty of knowing it, but after all, thinking and learning are born for the inheritance and accumulation of human wisdom! Tomorrow, focus on this topic: Do you need to do thoughtful learning? Or do academic thinking? The matter is big,Need to think carefully!

Before talking about this relationship between thinking and learning, let’s first talk about a condition. Tomorrow morning, we will talk about where to start “renovation and opening up”? Two days ago, I chatted with an old researcher in modern history. He was doing a researcher in the late Qing Dynasty. He said that the reform should have started from the late Qing Dynasty. Cixi also wanted to transform. It was only after the young people of the people of the country went out of the Taiwan Strait at that time that the relationship between the mother and the Han Dynasty became less severe, and then the big problem occurred. Of course, coupled with the departure of Zhang Zhidong, a banished official, the mastermind of the assistant ministers was gone, and it was also the main reason for the interpretation of the Han Alliance.

Now, in view of the Baocai, I think China’s “transformation and opening up” can be calculated after the second duck film battle. Chinese people have always been walking a path of slowly opening up and self-transformation. Looking at history, in fact, from the failure of “the monarch’s establishment” to the failure of “going to republic”, it was the result of constant trial. There is no doubt that until now, China is still changing!

But there is a very good historical rule here. As long as you go a step forward in history and form a certain common sense, it cannot retreat. We can see that whether it is Yuan Shikai or Zhang Hunting, and activities like Kang Party are all like this. If you want to go back, it will be impossible! So, why is this a “good” rule? It is good to say that the value judgment is good because history does not reverse due to temporary retreat. Of course, historical development must have developed. Now we are facing the global era of “anti-globalization” or “anti-globalization”, but the whole trend is still unchanged. Therefore, as a judgment of a historical study, what I want to say is that “reform and opening up” may not necessarily start in 1978. It can be said that from 1860 to the present, China has been renovating and opening up. History has a period of old and locked states, but the minor retreat has not changed. But “consciousness restrains” must be the subject of greatness. The discussions about what we call “truth standard” and the practical and practical methods of Dewey, who had the greatest influence on China during the period, are actually like a practical sentiment. But for Chinese people to use it, its “practical sensibility” is simpler and more practical, and at the same time, it is not so scientific. I remembered that in 1978, China opened a national science conference, including the teachers and teachers of humanities and social sciences such as Money Books, all participated, hoping that this “scientific”The spring of the year will continue.

 The second point, I want to talk about the so-called Zhang Li between thinking and learning? The masters will talk about the words that Teacher Li Zehou said in 1995. The original words are–“The thinking school faded out, Academicians are promising. It has been 23 years since this judgment was given. Maybe Teacher Li’s judgment is not wrong. Over the past 30 years, our academic pressure has been overwhelmed! Of course, many people have different opinions. Teacher Dun Xiaomang has an online article titled “Thinking fades out of academic promising is a kind of Self-deception, I believe this is a topic that was edited, but he proposed: When someone proposed in the 1990s that “thinking fades out and learning is protruding”, this was just a saying of self-deception in some people who thought they were very thoughtful, and the heroine had achieved good results in every topic, and became the lowest-performance Ye Qiulu.

  On the ordinary, we think that thinking and learning must be the two basic directions of Chinese or human wisdom. Thinking must focus on “creativeness”. The long and short creative power are often the main focus. The academic focus must be on “accumulativeness”. Although both are not in the same way, the structure here forms a structure of strength.

In previous years, the annual list of “Chinese Good Books” has been reviewed, and China Good Books have been around for many years. There is no philosophical or ideological book in it. When I was reviewing this year, I finally had two books: one is “The Beginning of Philosophy” by Dun Xiaomang, and the other is “Four Forks” by Zhao Tingyang, a colleague from a unified seminar. The first choice was all my first choice, and I have a good book on philosophy. Promote. As a result, when I saw the results the day before yesterday, I still lost all the thinking. In the past two years, I only had one book to read, and I translated it into Han Chinese, “Confucian Ancient Wei” by Xu Fancheng, the Institute of Religion of the Academy of Social Sciences, translated it back into Han, and I took it for a year. Good Book Award. This is also a reflection of thinking. Philosophy is indeed unattracted in contemporary China. In the future, economics will be able to achieve great results. I think economics will definitely be there, because economics must provide an explanation for the so-called Chinese plan and Chinese path. href=”https://twlovelog.com/Diana/”>Bain message boardBecause Chinese economics is not just about economics that are profitable.

  But on the contrary, thinking must have a very complicated relationship with learning. Is thinking difficult to understand without cumulative nature? Of course, thinking also has inheritance, so there is a faction of thinking. Confucianism is divided into eight, including Confucianism of Zi Zhang and Zi Si, as well as Confucianism. Confucian scholars of the Yang family and Meng family. Relatively speaking, does academic research need to be created? Of course, academic research also needs to be created! This kind of creation and innovation is not only the discovery of new data, but the discovery of new data. It is like learning from the simplified Chinese literature, from Guodian Zhushu to Shangbo and Qinghua. After discovering new data, many historical conclusions were pushed down. Including the appearance of “The Year of Bamboo Books”, it reminded Shi Shun not to take the throne but usurp the throne, which would break the hope and dependence of later generations for the three generations of political management.

 In addition to the data, there is also a third historical reflection, which will generate new insights into academics, which is also a problem in historical interpretation. From a longer stage, there is a transformation problem that can be a paradigm, not only a small view of innovation. Someone just said that he was the student of Mr. Hu. Mr. Hu. Mr. Hu. “From the Battle of the Duck Film to the May Fourth Movement, his methods of action have led to danger for many years. Even though the people in the Institute of Modern History always say that Mr. Hu had deep reflection in his old age. Until now, the historical method has quietly changed. We will never agree that history must be historical materials, because historical materials like “Historical Records” are worthy of doubt, and their historical reality has been overturned.

In fact, the “historical knowledge” in history researc